Gilles Deleuze: ππ ππ«π ππ’πππ₯ππ ππ’ππ‘ ππ¨π’π§ππ₯ππ¬π¬ πππ₯π€
We sometimes go on as though people canβt express themselves. In fact theyβre always expressing themselves. The sorriest couples are those where the woman canβt be preoccupied or tired without the man saying βWhatβs wrong? Say somethingβ¦,β or the man, without the woman saying β¦ and so on.
Radio and television have spread this spirit everywhere, and weβre riddled with pointless talk, insane quantities of words and images.
Stupidityβs never blind or mute. So itβs not a problem of getting people to express themselves but of providing little gaps of solitude and silence in which they might eventually find something to say.
Repressive forces donβt stop people expressing themselves but rather force them to express themselves; what a relief to have nothing to say, the right to say nothing, because only then is there a chance of framing the rare, and ever rarer, thing that might be worth saying.
What weβre plagued by these days isnβt any blocking of communication, but pointless statements.
But what we call the meaning of a statement is its point. Thatβs the only definition of meaning, and it comes to the same thing as a statementβs novelty. You can listen to people for hours, but whatβs the point? . . .
Thatβs why arguments are such a strain, why thereβs never any point arguing. You canβt just tell someone what theyβre saying is pointless. So you tell them itβs wrong. But what someone says is never wrong, the problem isnβt that some things are wrong, but that theyβre stupid or irrelevant. That theyβve already been said a thousand times.
The notions of relevance, necessity, the point of something, are a thousand times more significant than the notion of truth. Not as substitutes for truth, but as the measure of the truth of what Iβm saying.
Itβs the same in mathematics: PoincarΓ© used to say that many mathematical theories are completely irrelevant, pointless; He didnβt say they were wrong β that wouldnβt have been so bad.
You can find this passage in Gilles DeleuzeβsβNegotiations 1972-1990
My work and research I put into this Substack Page are entirely reader-supported. If you enjoy the content I provide and are not ready to become a paid subscriber, you can simply make a one-time donation here at Buy Me A Coffee. If you can. I appreciate each one of you who follows this page. You all truly made it into a magical little online community. Thank You.Β
No comment at all seems a proper non-response.
I listened to political talk on FoxNews the other day for the first time in years. What immediately struck me was how similar it was to sports chatter.